Discrepancies in the radiocarbon dating area of the turin shroud Frre sex

6854933580_2c8b688306_z

And you can also view every previous year's Website News pages at the links below: Today, January 21, 2017, marks our 21st anniversary on the internet!

Another year has passed and the website continues to grow and thrive, thanks to you, our loyal visitors and friends!

I am an Australian evangelical Christian in my 70s. Which is about the length of the Ninety Mile Beach in Victoria, Australia, only a part of which is shown right[24]. M., 2012, "New Photographs of Arizona Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory Samples," Shroud.com, November 21.

I am persuaded by the evidence that the Shroud of Turin is the burial sheet of Jesus Christ and bears His crucified and resurrected image. This is part #1 of my concluding summary of the evidence that the 1988 radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin as "mediaeval ... Therefore the 1988 radiocarbon dating of the Shroud as "1260-1390"[25] has effectively no chance of being correct, given that the Shroud is authentic (see above), and therefore first century. Hall stated it was "totally impossible" (his emphasis) that the Shroud could have a radiocarbon date of 1260-1390, yet its actual date was "AD 100" or less[26].■ Conventional explanations of the discrepancy all fail. T., 2010, "Investigating a Dated [sic] Piece of the Shroud of Turin," Radiocarbon, Vol 52, No 4.

I am an Australian evangelical Christian in my 70s.

I am persuaded by the evidence that the Shroud of Turin is the burial sheet of Jesus Christ and bears His crucified and resurrected image.

Our anniversary updates are usually large ones and often international in scope and today's update is no exception.

discrepancies in the radiocarbon dating area of the turin shroud-41discrepancies in the radiocarbon dating area of the turin shroud-81discrepancies in the radiocarbon dating area of the turin shroud-75

The “frosty” 6 contaminant is also not present on the Mark Evans image of the Shroud.15 As ‘the "frosty" coating is almost certainly a plant gum in the Raes sample’ 6 it is likely to be a plant gum in the Oxford sample.

Check here for important announcements and other Shroud of Turin Website news.

This page will be updated whenever new page additions, articles and other resources are added to the site.

The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelming that the 1988 radiocarbon-dating of the Shroud to 1290-1360 was wrong.

The above 1181 Entombment of Jesus by Nicholas of Verdun (1130-1205), like the Pray Manuscript (1192-1195), is clearly based on the Shroud (note the distinctive crossed hands and shroud), but is at least 109 years earlier than the earliest possible radiocarbon date 1290!

Here is my Shroud of Turin News for October/November 2008. Articles are in [Above (click to enlarge): Entombment of Jesus, by Nicholas of Verdun, 1181, Klosterneuburg abbey church, Vienna. 67, June 2008.] reverse chronological order (most recent uppermost). Discovery Channel's "UNWRAPPING THE SHROUD: NEW EVIDENCE" Re-Opens One Of Christianity's Greatest Mysteries, Reality TV News, Nov 28, 2008 -...

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!